F \l_ED 2 Lll\lq DEC - 3 M'I 9: I.ii 3 c:c-H"/l. KRt,S\,i 4 0 ;-.g~g~(iKCc\EWt>-sH 5 6 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON 7 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 8 In re the Marriage of: NO. 04-3-022IO-l 9 GREGORY ALAN SIFFERMAN, 10 REPLY RE: MOTION FOR Petitioner, REVISION 11 and 12...
More
F \l_ED 2 Lll\lq DEC - 3 M'I 9: I.ii 3 c:c-H"/l. KRt,S\,i 4 0 ;-.g~g~(iKCc\EWt>-sH 5 6 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON 7 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 8 In re the Marriage of: NO. 04-3-022IO-l 9 GREGORY ALAN SIFFERMAN, 10 REPLY RE: MOTION FOR Petitioner, REVISION 11 and 12 13 SUSAN BETH HUMPHREY, jka: Sifferman, 14 Respondent. 15 16 COMES NOW the Petitioner Gregory Sifferman by and through his attorney, Gail B. Nunn, 17 and O'Loane Nunn Law Group, P.L.L.C., and makes the following reply to the materials 18 submitted by Ms. Dyer. 19 A motion for revision 1s de nova on the record that was before the court 20 commissioner who heard the original hearing. As it was, Ms. Dyer violated the local rule as 21 22 to page limits in the submission of her original materials including substantial reply 23 documents well beyond the 5 page limit. All materials in Ms. Dyer's Response relating to 24 additional evidence (commencing on page 12, line 21 through page 13, line 24) should be 25 stricken from the record and no
Less
